The G-20 ministers declared their meeting in Pittsburgh a success, but as Rob Kall reports in OpEdNews.com, the meeting’s main success was to turn Pittsburgh into "a ghost-town, emptied of workers and the usual pedestrians, but filled to overflowing with over 12,000 swat cops from all over the US." This is "freedom and democracy" at work. The leaders of the G-20 countries, which account for 85% of the world’s income, cannot meet in an American city without 12,000 cops outfitted like the emperor’s storm troopers in Star Wars. And the US government complains about Iran. More. . .
During the last four decades, a well-publicized shift in what undergraduate students prefer to study has taken place in American higher education. The number of young men and women majoring in English has dropped dramatically; the same is true of philosophy, foreign languages, art history, and kindred fields, including history. As someone who has taught in four university English departments over the last 40 years, I am dismayed by this shift, as are my colleagues here and there across the land. And because it is probably irreversible, it is important to attempt to sort out the reasons—the many reasons—for what has happened. More. . .
If you are straight, white, and male, please stand up. Congratulations, you are more privileged than you probably ever realized. Because of your blessed birth, you are responsible for the victimization of thousands of your underprivileged peers. You may not be aware, but implicitly you hate, resent, and distrust everyone who does not look like you. How does this make you feel? No, do not answer. Instead, allow us to tell you how you should be feeling. You should be feeling extremely guilty and ashamed, and in order to move past your racist tendencies and make amends for being born privileged, you should apologize to those you victimize daily. Now, tell us how you feel. More. . .
The main co-star of Inglourious Basterds, Eli Roth, is shown holding the baseball bat that he uses to bash out the brains of captured (and defenseless) German soldiers. Roth joyously calls this Weinstein Bros. production that glorifies torture, sadism, scalping and burning alive of Germans as “Jewish Porn” and “orgiastic.”
I am always fascinated to observe when a liberal pundit is dragged kicking and screaming to the admission that they’ve been wrong about something all their lives. New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd has finally admitted something that almost everybody knows, especially American women: The great feminist revolution has not succeeded in making women equal, but only in making them miserable. More. . .
I think I'm done for now. What's the point continuing? I'm posting only to myself. On a personal note, I'll never walk again, I have only one working hand, and I haven't had a shower in more than two months (I get sponge baths). I have neither friends nor family. There's no one I want to talk to, and I'm sure the feeling's mutual. My younger son can't be educated and my wife is exhausted from taking care of me. I now wear a Depends or some such thing.
But I'd find that bearable were the West not dying. I'm tired. I have no joy and none to look forward to. I'm signing off for good.
“Rich countries are simply those which are lucky enough, for historical reasons, to have a great deal of this clustered [industrial] activity.” Hard to believe anybody could write the sentence above and be serious. How is it that whites , wherever they end up on earth are “lucky” whereas Blacks always end up ” unlucky”? Hell of a coincidence Wouldn’t you say? Always good to start of a morning with a good laugh.- Peter A. on ARlist SOURCE. . .
"Let me ask you a question. If someone tried to sell you his excrement for $10, would you buy it? Probably not. Well, consider this: on May 23, 2007, a can labeled Artist’s Shit, purportedly containing the excrement of artist Piero Manzoni, was sold at Sotheby’s for €124,000 (US$ 180,000). "How is it done? Is a can of shit worth its weight in gold? It obviously is — if people are fighting to buy it. "A larger question: If you can con people into buying shit, can you also con them into evil wars in the Middle East and mass cultural suicide in their own homelands? Nothing easier. It’s being done right now." Part 1Paer 2
Just like the traitor who just left the White House. And why not? They're every bit as American as he is - especially the ones who have been here ten generations.
"The difference of race is one of the reasons why I fear war may always exist; because race implies difference, difference implies superiority, and superiority leads to predominance. "
Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881)
Glen Beck, Lou Dobbs, and now even Rush Limbaugh have noticed:
I hope so - it's long overdue. I advise following the links in this piece, which I consider mandatory reading. Something awful is headed our way, and you wont be able to avoid it.
A comment at Lawrence Auster's site impressed me so much that I'm printing the whole thing: For the last week or so I've been pondering exactly the point made by Limbaugh and at your site. More specifically, I've been thinking to myself that if this keeps up, then the American people are probably not going to elect another black president for a long, long time. Having gotten a taste of the hush-tactics of the left--those predictable, cheap denunciations of Obama's critics as racists, merits be damned--I wonder whether people are going to want to elect yet another president who simply can't be opposed, no matter how radical his agenda happens to be. I have no way of knowing for certain, but my gut tells me that all this race-baiting is going to hurt Obama way, way more than it helps him, and that if he doesn't take some proactive steps to distance himself from those charges that he will suffer for it in 2012. Here's the thing: Obama was elected on the promise that he would be a "post-racial" president. Set aside the sheer stupidity of this line of thought (that by electing a man on the basis of his race and then having an orgiastic three-month celebration of that fact that we could somehow ... er ... get beyond race). The point is that many, many people voted for Obama because they had an impermeable faith in the healing effect this would have on race relations in America. Why, he was so post-racial and post-partisan that, in the words of Newsweek's Evan Thomas, he's "above the country, above--above the world, he's sort of God." One thing his supporters pointed to was his speech during the Jeremiah Wright controversy, in which he offered that "to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns--this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding." The big problem with that, of course, is that this was a campaign speech and the purpose of it was to get the man elected. People constantly elide this point. He was willing to say just about anything to make the Wright controversy go away, and he only offered that fig leaf after accusing conservative commentators of "building their careers" by shutting down legitimate discussion of race. And more to the point: he hasn't had one word to say about the people currently labeling his critics racist. If Obama was really "a sort of God" standing above the racial tumult in this country trying with all his golden-hearted might to get Americans beyond the resentments of the past, one would expect he'd have something more to say about these incessant, incendiary accusations. If he's a "god," then he must be a clockmaker-style god who simply sets events in motion then loftily ignores them. And of course the biggest reason that no one is a fervent deist is precisely because such a god is really rather unpraiseworthy, and certainly not a figure to whom we can attach anything like love or loyalty. My bottom line is that Obama's silence--just like his silence during 20 years of the most abominable racial vitriol spewing from his "spiritual mentor" Wright--says more about the man than any half-hearted, minor concession of expedience. And if Americans find that ordinary democratic politics is impossible while a non-white occupies the White House, then my guess is that many of them will conclude, in the quiet of their own hearts, that the experiment just hasn't worked and probably won't so long as the American left remains in thrall to that intellectual sickness we call "political correctness." Indeed, I'd be willing to make a bet that after all this liberal hectoring of the American people--which includes the president, who simply can't seem to stop shouting into the microphone at us--we won't be too eager to line up at the polls for four more years of it.
Black political columnists of notably limited thinking abilities are a fixture at major mainstream newspapers such as the Washington Post, the New York Daily News, and the New York Times. The difference between these black columnists and their white colleagues is exactly the same as obtains between black and white students at top universities and graduate schools: there is no overlap between the two races. The blacks who are given sinecures as columnists are characterized by a level of intellectual ability for which any white would be automatically rejected for the same position. As evidence for my point, here's a black columnist I hadn't heard of before, Courtland Milloy of the Washington Post. The column below is not worth commenting on, in fact it defies analysis, but it's worth reading for the sheer, well, stupidity of it. SOURCE. . .
The U.S. Census Bureau is projecting that, by the year 2042, minorities will become the majority of the U.S. population. Hispanics, now 15 percent of the population, are expected to double their share of the population, to 30 per cent. The new numbers suggest a nation more racially and ethnically diverse, and much older.
The Islamic name overtook traditional choices like Jack, Thomas and Daniel to become the number one name in the West Midlands, Yorkshire and the Humber, and the North West, as well as in the capital, in 2008.
Joe Wilson spoke for the over 100 million white Americans whose letters are suppressed by the racist media, e.g., the NYT, who have to endure racial socialist “diversity training” at work and in school, losing college admissions, jobs, anmd promotions to unqualified blacks and Hispanics, savage, racially-motivated black and Hispanic crime, and racist blacks, Hispanics, and whites who demand that they underwrite their own dispossession and disenfranchisement.
The man on the cover is Juan de Pareja. He was the Mulatto son of a slave girl who worked for the famous Spanish painter Diego Velazquez. The only reason this man’s name was recorded in history or his likeness painted, was because he swept the floor in Diego Velázquez’s workshop. Rather than choose from the multitudes of famous people from Western society, Bedford/St. Martin choose a 17th century Mulatto janitor to grace the cover of a 1,050 page textbook on Western society. SOURCE